The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy

Academic Article


  • Background: Obesity is increasing among American women, especially as they age. The influence of obesity on the accuracy of screening mammography has not been studied extensively. Methods: We analyzed 100 622 screening mammography examinations performed on members of a nonprofit health plan. The relationship between body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) and measures of screening accuracy was assessed. Body mass index was categorized as underweight or normal weight (<25), overweight (25-29), obesity class I (30-34), and obesity classes II to III (≥35). Results: Compared with underweight or normal weight women, overweight and obese women were more likely to be recalled for additional tests after adjusting for important covariates, including age and breast density (overweight odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.23); obesity class I OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35; obesity classes II-III OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.41). As body mass index increased, women were more likely to have lower specificity (overweight OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.90; obesity class I OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84; and obesity classes II-III OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.82). No statistically significant differences were noted in sensitivity. Adjusted receiver operating characteristic analysis showed statistically significant improvement in the area under the curve (AUC) for underweight or normal weight women (AUC=0.941) vs overweight women (AUC=0.916, P=.02) and underweight or normal weight women vs obesity classes II and III women (AUC=0.904, P=.02). Conclusions: Obese women had more than a 20% increased risk of having false-positive mammography results compared with underweight and normal weight women, although sensitivity was unchanged. Achieving a normal weight may improve screening mammography performance.
  • Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Elmore JG; Carney PA; Abraham LA; Barlow WE; Egger JR; Fosse JS; Cutter GR; Edward Hendrick R; D'Orsi CJ; Paliwal P
  • Start Page

  • 1140
  • End Page

  • 1147
  • Volume

  • 164
  • Issue

  • 10