DNA repair mechanisms involved in gemcitabine cytotoxicity and in the interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin

Academic Article


  • The influence of DNA repair mechanisms on the interaction between gemcitabine and cisplatin was studied using a panel of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines each deficient in one of the following repair pathways: base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NER and HR are known to be involved in platinum-DNA adduct repair. Single agent experiments demonstrated that each of the repair deficient cell lines had a similar sensitivity towards gemcitabine as the parental cell lines, whereas the NER- and HR-deficient lines showed increased sensitivity towards cisplatin. Furthermore, in the parental cell lines, the administration sequence cisplatin followed by gemcitabine was synergistic, whereas the reversed schedule showed additivity and simultaneous administration revealed antagonistic cytotoxicity. In the repair deficient cell lines, using this synergistic schedule of cisplatin followed by gemcitabine, loss of synergy was observed in the NER- and HR-deficient cell lines. However, the magnitude of the effect in the NER-deficient cells was small. The sensitivity to the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine shown by the BER- and NHEJ-deficient cell lines did not differ significantly from that of the parental cell line. Cellular accumulation of platinum as well as the formation of GG- and AG-intrastrand adducts in the parental line and in the HR-deficient line were not affected by gemcitabine. In conclusion, our results indicate that BER, NER, HR, and NHEJ are most likely incapable of modulating the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, and that HR is involved in the synergistic interaction between cisplatin and gemcitabine in our cell system. © 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Crul M; Van Waardenburg RCAM; Bocxe S; Van Eijndhoven MAJ; Pluim D; Beijnen JH; Schellens JHM
  • Start Page

  • 275
  • End Page

  • 282
  • Volume

  • 65
  • Issue

  • 2