A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript

Academic Article


  • OBJECTIVE. In this article, we provide a step-by-step guide to reviewing a manuscript that we hope will improve the quality of reviews for the AJR. CONCLUSION. We have provided a detailed series of guidelines for providing excellent reviews of manuscripts. The template we have provided can be used to serve as a checklist for important questions to ask about manuscripts during the review process. Finally, the principles presented here also can be used as a guide for authors by providing a list of important features to include during manuscript preparation and thereby prospectively address questions that good reviewers are likely to ask. © American Roentgen Ray Society.
  • Published In

    Digital Object Identifier (doi)

    Author List

  • Provenzale JM; Stanley RJ
  • Start Page

  • 848
  • End Page

  • 854
  • Volume

  • 185
  • Issue

  • 4